Home World Business Uber lifts financial veil, posts $2.8 billion loss

Uber lifts financial veil, posts $2.8 billion loss


The ride-hailing giant more than doubled gross bookings in 2016 to $20 billion

The ride-hailing giant more than doubled gross bookings in 2016 to $20 billion

Technologies isn’t required to report its finances publicly, but the privately held has decided to forgo that luxury for the first time. said its revenue growth is outpacing losses, hoping to show the is on a strong trajectory as it attempts to address a recent cascade of scandals.

The ride-hailing giant more than doubled gross bookings in 2016 to $20 billion, according to financial information shared with Bloomberg. was $6.5 billion, while adjusted net losses were $2.8 billion, excluding the business, which it sold last summer.

declined to report first-quarter numbers, saying they were in line with expectations but that the hasn’t yet presented them to The said it’s pleased to see revenue growth far exceeding losses last year and that its is still performing well this year even as it faces unyielding controversy. “We’re fortunate to have a healthy and growing business, giving us the room to make the changes we know are needed on management and accountability, our culture and organisation, and our relationship with drivers,” Rachel Holt, who runs Uber’s U.S. ride-hailing business, wrote in an emailed statement.

In recent months, has seen an exodus of top executives as it investigates claims of sexual harassment and a toxic work culture. is facing a lawsuit over self-driving car technology from Alphabet Inc.’s Waymo, backtracked on a program called Greyball that was used to deceive government officials and apologised after its chief executive officer was videotaped arguing with a driver. Travis Kalanick, the CEO, said he’s seeking a chief operating officer to help right the ship.

Uber’s is massive and getting bigger. In the last three months of 2016, gross bookings increased 28 percent from the previous quarter to $6.9 billion. The generated $2.9 billion in revenue, a 74 percent increase from the third quarter. Losses rose 6.1 percent over the same period to $991 million.

While the rate of sales growth compared with losses is encouraging, is still losing a significant sum, said Evan Rawley, a professor at Columbia University. “That’s a lot of cash to burn in a quarter,” he said. Jeff Jones, the company’s president of ridesharing who resigned last month, previously joked to staff that he joined expecting P&L, meaning a profit and statement, but only found an L.

said it uses generally accepted accounting principles. Revenue includes only the portion takes from fares, except in the case of its carpooling service; the counts the entire amount of an UberPool fare as revenue. The more Uber’s shifts to the multi-passenger service, the faster revenue grows. Non-GAAP revenue is significantly smaller. The statement doesn’t account for employee stock compensation, certain real-estate investments, automobile purchases and other expenses.

Valued at $69 billion by investors, operates in about 75 countries. The was spending aggressively to compete in China, with about $1 billion in losses there last year, bringing its losses to $3.8 billion globally. It sold the in August. As part of the deal, it received an 18 percent stake in local ride-hailing Didi Chuxing and recognised the value of those shares in its financial statement. said global net losses were $1.2 billion after accounting for the sale, taxes and other factors.

Since it was founded in 2009, has burned through at least $8 billion. The said it has $7 billion of cash on hand, along with an untapped $2.3 billion credit facility.

Lyft Inc., which is Uber’s main competitor in the U.S., is also closely held and doesn’t disclose financial performance. It’s difficult to compare Uber’s with any public partly models itself after Amazon.com Inc., but even at the peak of the dot-com boom, Amazon lost less than $2 billion, adjusted for inflation. Amazon has never lost more than that in a year. Chipmakers Qualcomm Inc. and Micron Technology Inc., which require large capital investments, never lost that much.

is a one-of-a-kind company, in good ways and bad ways. It’s going to be a case study,” said Aswath Damodaran, a finance professor at New York University.  “This is a cash-burning machine.” 



Eric Newcomer | Bloomberg

Business Standard

http://bsmedia.business-standard.com/_media/bs/wap/images/bs_logo_amp.png 177 22


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here